Get Started for FREE
Sign up with Facebook Sign up with X
I don't have a Facebook or a X account
 Your new post is loading...
Scoop.it!
En 5º de Primaria uno de los criterios de evaluación de la asignatura Valores Sociales y Cívicos nos habla de participa 
No comment yet.
Sign up to comment
Scoop.it!
¿Todas las “alfabetizaciones” son iguales y cambia solamente el contenido? ¿Qué significa entonces alfabetización? ¿Es necesaria tanta alfabetización? Via Alejandro Tortolini, Labtic.Unipe, maria cristina ALCARRAZ VIGIL
Alejandro Tortolini's curator insight,
June 25, 2013 7:05 PM
Excelente artículo de Débora Kozak sobre el concepto de alfabetización tecnológica. |
Scoop.it!
RelatedPosts Todos cometemos errores octubre 9, 2019 60 propuestas educativas y otras cosillas septiembre 27, 2019 ¿Por qué os creéis que sé de horchatas? septiembre 16, 2019 El otro día, en uno de los posts que publiqué, recibí un comentario en una de las redes sociales que solo uso para publicarlos (sí, no puedo con…
Scoop.it!
After a testing few months for Spotify with criticism from artists, the streaming music service has a new foe: dance brand Ministry of Sound.
The company is suing Spotify for copyright infringement, claiming that the service has refused to remove user playlists that mirror Ministry of Sound compilation albums, including some that use the brand’s name in their titles. Via Guillaume Decugis, Alejandro Tortolini
Guillaume Decugis's curator insight,
September 4, 2013 12:34 PM
I'm not a lawyer and I don't know how British law will rule that. But the mere existence of a lawsuit shows some believe enough in the value of content curation - what the Ministry of Sound effectively provides when producing their famous compilation albums - to think it should be protected by copyright or trademark law. Seems a bit meta? Probably. And it also shows the limits of copyright law growingly challenged by the remix culture. 
A. Brian Dengler's comment,
September 5, 2013 3:14 PM
This is a fascinating issue. The names of songs listed in alphabetical order would be mere facts, and facts are not protected by copyright law, at least in the US. However, compilations that include editorial judgment in its selection of songs (the songs may fit a certain genre, reached a certain point of sales and appeal to a specific market), just may be protected by copyright. However, then you get into other analysis: did the postings on Spotify "copy" the Ministry of Sound's compilations, and how much originality did Ministry of Sound use to create the compilation? The outcome will be fascinating.
Alejandro Tortolini's curator insight,
September 28, 2013 11:55 AM
Debate: curaduría de contenidos y leyes de copyright (caso Ministry of Sound versus Spotify) |
